In spite of tea’s nearly ubiquitous presence as a traditional beverage throughout major parts of the world, the recent growth in interest in tea in the United States appears to be largely driven by the promotion of tea as a healthy drink. In the ideal scenario this serves as an initial entry into the rich world of tea and tea cultures, leading to pursuit of knowledge and more exploration of good teas. But this focus on health can have negative repercussions as well, particularly in terms of expectations and an industry with its priorities in the wrong place, away from high quality and variety of the leaf.

I don’t think that anyone questions the assertion that tea is a healthful beverage. There are people who have reasons not to drink it, like caffeine sensitivity, but the bottom line is that it’s a beverage made from the leaf of a plant that is fully recognized as safe for humans to consume. Particularly when compared to other commonly consumed beverages which are not so trustworthy, tea holds up as a reliably healthy choice. By way of contrast, I don’t think that many people would defend soft drinks or malt liquor as being healthful beverages. None of this is controversial, or necessary to delve too deeply into. The troubles begin when tea is defined and described as a substance delivering particular, quantifiable positive impacts to the body, including alleviating or preventing certain medical conditions.

One important element in the whole discussion of the “healthfulness” of tea is recognizing and acknowledging the difference between foods and medicines. The FDA is quite clear on the difference, and it’s pretty easy to understand. The concept of healthy food is enormously variable depending on individual body types and conditions, and should be approached by each individual based on their own needs. But medicine is a substance that is clearly and explicitly intended to create a change in the bodily condition of the person consuming it. While there are quite a few substances that are used medicinally that are not recognized as medicines from a legal standpoint in the U.S., the people producing and selling those substances are strictly regulated in terms of the language they can attach to them. This does not mean that they don’t work, but it does mean that they can not be sold as substances that have that particular effect on the body. It also does not mean that any and all of these unofficially recognized “medicines” are entirely safe for consumption. Like everything else, consumers should be well aware of what they consume and how it may affect the body.

But back to the specifics: tea is not medicine. More importantly, as tea drinkers we really do not want it to ever be sanctioned and regulated by the FDA as a medicine. This would have enormous and far-reaching impact on the tea industry which would severely damage it, because aroma, flavor, tradition, character, etc. have no bearing on the validity of a substance as medicine. Medicine just has to do what it is sold to do. It needs to perform consistently in laboratory tests of its efficacy. Given the broad scope of what “tea” encompasses and all of the different ways it is consumed and produced, I do not believe that there is any danger of a shift towards tea being recognized and regulated as a medicine. But what is important is that tea may not be marketed as if it is. Unilever, the company that owns Lipton has recently felt the hammer of the FDA come down on it for doing exactly this. The following is excerpted from the FDA’s warning letter to Unilever, and it is instructive in illustrating the distinction:

For example, your webpage entitled “Tea and Health,” subtitled “Heart Health Research” and further subtitled “Cholesterol Research” bears the following claim: “[F]our recent studies in people at risk for coronary disease have shown a significant cholesterol lowering effect from tea or tea flavonoids … One of these studies, on post-menopausal women, found that total cholesterol was lowered by 8% after drinking 8 cups of green tea daily for 12 weeks ….”

The therapeutic claims on your website establish that the product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Your Lipton Green Tea 100% Natural Naturally Decaffeinated product is not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, the product is a “new drug” under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally marketed in the U.S. without prior approval from FDA as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)]. FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective.

Of course, there are numerous legitimate studies which evaluate the potential applications of tea, and its various individual components, for use medicinally on the human body. These are welcomed and necessary for their contribution to the scientific pursuit of understanding of the tea plant. These studies also have varying levels of reliability, but concrete, measurable data about tea and how bodies respond to it is something that the tea industry needs. But promoting tea as overall, or in any particular beverage forms, as a medicine is bad for the health of the tea industry.

Possibly Related Posts:

• Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Bat
• Lost in Translation
• Oolong? Wulong? Wu Long? Wu-Long? 烏龍?
• the Words for Tea

Chan Chu (蟾蜍, chánchú) is the most common form that tea mascots can be found in. This is the omnipresent three-legged toad with the money on his back, symbol of prosperity and an annoying reminder of a lot of really silly blather about feng shui.

Tea mascots are almost always connected to good fortune that involves wealth. They often have coins or other forms of money built into their design and are said to encourage good fortune.

Personally, I have no illusions about the use of these creatures bringing me any enhanced wealth, in fact they’re pretty good at insuring that I have less of it periodically, but I find some of them very compelling and attractive, especially as they’re getting doused with tea. My new favorite of these tea mascot is this bat (biān​fú​, 蝙蝠) that I bought recently. He is made from a dark, slightly rough clay, like most of the others. He also has a coin in his mouth that turns and very attractive tiny black beads for eyes.

I don’t normally name inanimate objects (other than four-decade-old cars), but I think this charming fellow needs a name. Any suggestions?

Possibly Related Posts:

• 恭喜發財 – Happy Year of the Water Dragon!
• Pure Pu’er
• Chado: The Way of Tea, at ArtXchange
• ATB Blog Carnival: AdagioTeas’ “Roots Campaign.”
• How I generally brew shu pu’er

Would any of you Chinese-speaking tea people like to help me out with a translation?

Possibly Related Posts:

• 恭喜發財 – Happy Year of the Water Dragon!
• Pure Pu’er
• ATB Blog Carnival: AdagioTeas’ “Roots Campaign.”
• How I generally brew shu pu’er
• Da Hong Pao among the mists

Having never formally studied any Chinese languages I surmised that the word “oolong” was the proper English transliteration of the Mandarin Chinese name for a family of teas and that “wulong” was a word that had come into vogue for use in preposterous and unfounded weight-loss claims in order to promote Chinese oolong teas. While “wulong” is the more common choice in deceptive marketing materials and by sensationalist talk show hosts, ironically it is the correct word in Pinyin (the official Romanization system for Mandarin Chinese). The source of “oolong” is the Wade Giles system, which has largely been supplanted by the Pinyin in recent years. The Mandarin characters for wulong tea are: 烏龍茶, the first two characters representing the syllables “wu” or “oo” and “long” respectively. The third character represents “cha” the Mandarin word for tea. Getting a consistent answer as to the one true Pinyin word is even a challenge. It appears frequently as “wulong,” wu-long,” and “wu long” and in more precise usage includes diacritical markings, making it “wūlóng.”

If you see Chinese words that are spelled differently from the Pinyin standard, they were probably imported into the English speaking world via Taiwan, or else they have been in use since before Pinyin was common. It is also possible that they came from another another language, such as Cantonese or Japanese.

- from this article on the topic on the
Tea From Taiwan site

Of course we get into a little bit of a tangle about which word to choose when it is commonly understood that the word in English is “oolong.” So then you have to decide if the English word “oolong” or the Pinyin Chinese word “wulong” better suits your purpose. There is a very fine line between using the antiquated form of Wade Giles “oolong” and the English word “oolong.” This whole discussion may be dismissed as self-indulgent sophistry, but regardless of which words you choose yourself to refer to those fabulous semi-oxidized teas, the history behind the jumble of choices is pretty interesting.

Possibly Related Posts:

• 恭喜發財 – Happy Year of the Water Dragon!
• Pure Pu’er
• ATB Blog Carnival: AdagioTeas’ “Roots Campaign.”
• How I generally brew shu pu’er
• Da Hong Pao among the mists

Have you ever wondered why, when most of the major tea-growing regions of the world, including China, where the tea plant was originally cultivated, all use some variant of the word “cha” to indicate tea and the plant that it comes from, almost all of the Western countries call it “tea” or variants of that word?

examples:
Chinese (Mandarin): cha
Japan: cha
Persia: cha
Arabic: chai
Turkish: chay
Russian: chai
Indian: cha
Sri Lankan: cha
Pakistani: cha
Bangladesh: cha

English: tea
German: tee
French: thé

As is the case with many linguistic riddles, the answer lies along trade routes. The British established trade posts in Xiamen, in the Fujian Province of China, during the Ming Dynasty, mid-seventeenth century. In Xiamen, the word approximately pronounced “tay” is used rather than the Mandarin “cha.” The British spelled it “tea,” which splintered off into the words “thé” in France and “tee” in Germany.

In contrast, the word “char” is a common slang term for tea in Britain, which most likely emerged out of 19th and 20th century British Imperialism.

sources:

• Why the name “TEA” on chinese-tea.net.
• English Words Borrowed from Chinese
• The Word For Tea Around The World
  
• the etymology section of the Wikipedia entry on tea

Possibly Related Posts:

• Is tea a beverage or a medicine?
• Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Bat
• Lost in Translation
• Oolong? Wulong? Wu Long? Wu-Long? 烏龍?